Criticism on TV Criticism: Split TV is a Pseudo Need

1. Split TV is a pseudo-need: In the era of non-smart phones, changing a mobile phone one year is also a pseudo-need. However, iphone turned overnight from a durable consumer product into a fashion consumer product. In fact, do you really need to replace iphone4 with iphone6? Of course it is needed! But the real reason is that the people around you are also replaced with iphone6. . In addition, I think the reason for split TV is that Barley TV defines split TV as operator TV instead of a new feature TV. This is Dr. Peng's advantage as an operator. Operators have every reason and ability to give a 299-yuan set-top box to users who buy 100M broadband each year, thereby creating a competitive advantage differentiated from other broadband operators. Broadband users have a box that is never out of date, this is the core value of the operator's hardware, otherwise how can you expect the operator box to go beyond the boxes of pure hardware manufacturers from ID, UI, interaction, and functionality?

2, a person a cell phone, so a remote control: cool open on April Fool's Day and everyone opened a "to a TV with three remote control" joke it? I think "cool open more than just a TV, and "Three televisions" and three-in-one TVs are definitely not gimmicks! Today's Internet TVs are subverting and innovating in a very high-pitched manner. However, Coolopen is based on the most basic product performance and user experience: to be a third-generation company. TVs that people like, let three generations of the elderly, adults and children have their favorite remote control, their favorite UI interface and interactive experience, and even have their own favorite video content. There are also several critically acclaimed points: For example, parents can use their mobile phones to send photos, videos, recommendations, and applications to televisions for the elderly and children at home. These multi-screen interactive functions that sound like the ears are worn out seem to have nothing, but compared to those who sell their own mobile phones to their own TVs to send WeChat and photos, which do you think is the real needs of the user? Which is the manufacturer's self Entertain yourself? The "three-in-one TV" and "two-screen interaction between mobile phones and televisions at different time and place, different family members (SNS interaction between family members is the strongest social relationship)" is two A very grounded product and experience is a typical Internet-style disruptive innovation in the OTT industry!

3, designers or foreign countries are good: China's mobile phone battlefield is becoming the main battlefield of the global mobile phone, millet, Meizu, Huawei, ZTE, Lenovo, Cool, as well as music, 360, there is no smoke between the smoke can simply take Hollywood Big movie. Needless to say, regardless of technology products or design marketing, Chinese mobile phones have already beaten Motorola and Nokia, and the gap between Samsung, LG, and Joey's widow iphone is getting smaller and smaller. I am optimistic about the future of Chinese mobile phones. I think this may be the future of the global mobile phone. In the near future, like the table tennis game, the National Games will be the Olympic Games. It is a pity that I haven’t been a designer in my life. But as an amateur, I’ve been very close to the industrial design of mobile phones, TVs, and even the environmental design of decoration and gardening. Designing this thing is not an economic foundation but a superstructure if China The economy has become the world's number one, then the eight great mountain people, Qi Baishi will certainly surpass Monet, Van Gogh. There is a reality that is somewhat surprising to us: In the top ten listed Internet companies in the world, there are six in the United States and four in China. Oh, no Europe and no Japan and South Korea, I think this will allow us to foresee an Internet-enabled mobile phone. With the future of the TV industry, Designed by China will not be too far away from entering the world-class design.

4. Fragmentation is Android's everlasting pain: Apple is Apple's apple, but Android can only become Android around the world. Apple is and is just an artwork in the field of science and technology. I have collected hundreds of lions of Oriental culture STYLE. The price of all lions is only related to a little bit: it is industrialized or handmade. That little lion!). So at this point, we don't need to tangled up with Google at all. We need to have a professional belief that we believe that technology will change the world and we will also change ourselves. We can't statically look at Android's few points, whether it's technology-driven or market-driven. In the future, Internet TV will certainly be a big success, but of course it will not be the current TV. As Hemingway once said: We know where the future is, but we do not know how to arrive.

How far is that television from subversion? Oh, light years have never been a unit of time, but a unit of distance. Humans tend to overestimate the short-term value of a new technology and underestimate the long-term value of a new technology. Just like the author of the black swan, Nasem Taleb, history is always easy to interpret as the previous future, but the future is not easy to predict. Do a good job in today’s Internet TV, make bold assumptions and be cautious about it. The purpose of the argument and even the quarrel is not to prove who is right or wrong, but to get closer and closer to the one that can guide our progress. The old section of the Internet thinks that we must have this mentality.